Playboy Won't Pay for Britney - StyleList

Skip to Content

Love our makeover? Tell us what you think.

Playboy Won't Pay for Britney

Filed under: CELEBRITY STYLE, Celebrity, News

If her embarrassing performance at the VMAs was any sort of indication of Britney Spears' future success then I think we can all say that a star has fallen. Should you need any tangible evidence of her decline, consider her latest PR disaster.

The National Ledger reports that Playboy is only willing to shell out $400,000 to have Spears pose nude for a magazine feature. Britney insists that she won't take off her clothes for less than seven figures, a sum that has been scoffed at by editor/founder/whatever Hugh Hefner.

Boffo! Can we all just agree that this is good news?

Seriously, we've seen all there is to see of Britney Spears for free. The only thing Playboy could add to that is some air-brushing and good lighting, which would be a small improvement, but not enough to make up for the fact that no one out there wants to see that woman naked. (If I'm wrong about this, please let me know.)

You know that saying about how you can't put the toothpaste back into the tube? Well, I think that pretty much sums up Britney Spears.

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 79)

 

Add your comments

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.

When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.

To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.

ADVERTISEMENT

Giveaway

Courtesy of Kinerase

Anti-Aging Miracle Serum

Score Kinerase's celeb favorite youth booster