Celebs at the holidays: the Bush girls

Posted Dec 17th 2007 at 10:43PM by Jonathon Morgan (Subscribe to Jonathon Morgan's posts)

Filed under: CELEBRITY STYLE, Celebrity

21 Comments

Print Email More

Barbara and Lauren Bush

The Bush girls opted for very different looks for this holiday party. Barbara (left) went straight up loud with a festive red number -- that, due the length, still manages to look very classy. Lauren, on the other hand, went gold and sparkly -- a look that usually works at this time of year, but is surprisingly plain (and just a little tacky) here.

Maybe Barbara could share some of her fashion advice?

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)

Kim 12-20-2007 @ 4:01PM

You know these two are cousins not sisters right?

Elizabeth 12-23-2007 @ 7:40AM

YES THEY ARE COUSINGS. BARBARA'S SISTER JUST GOT ENGAGED AND HAS LIGHT BLONDE HAIR AND ALSO BARBARA'S SISTER. THIS GAL IS JEB BUSH'S DAUGHTER. YOU'D THINK AOL WOULD KNOW THAT....

rere 12-23-2007 @ 8:07AM

Lauren is not Jeb's daughter. His daughter is the drug addict. Jeanna is the other first daugher.

pepper 12-23-2007 @ 8:55AM

Lauren is the daughter of Neil Bush. Barbara's twin sister is named Jenna. My God, the depth of knowledge around here is overwhelming.

Val 12-23-2007 @ 10:25AM

lmao I was thinking that exact same thing pepper. Pretty scary knowing that people are just that stupid

Debb 12-23-2007 @ 9:23AM

You would think AOL would get their facts straight before putting them online for all too see!!! They look great but they are NOT President Bush's twin daughter!!! You would think after 8 years in the White House that AOL could figure out who was who!!!

AMAZED 12-23-2007 @ 10:38AM

Besides all the other idiotic mistakes, why does no one see that these girls, especially cousin Lauren, the model, are anorexic? I've seen more feminine figures on 10 year old girls. This whole article is just plain scary!

bbrohawk4 12-23-2007 @ 11:05AM

Barbara and Lauren Bush are not sisters. They are first cousins. I can't believe that with all of your comments that you don't know this fact.

Sandy 12-23-2007 @ 11:54AM

AOL! I NEED A JOB! MAYBE YOU CAN HIRE ME! I KNOW WHO THE YOUNG WOMEN ARE AT LEAST! BOTH OF THEM DO LOOK FABULOUS!

felipe2141959 12-23-2007 @ 12:03PM

H E L L O ! ! ! ARE THE BUSH TWINS NOW TRIPLETS? WHAT HAPPEN TO JENNA? I THINK SOMEONE OUGHT TO TELL MR. AND MRS. BUSH AND AOL!

Celeste 12-23-2007 @ 1:34PM

No where does it say they are sisters! They are both Bush girls

Alicia 12-25-2007 @ 3:47AM

Thanks Celeste for mentioning the fact that no where in this article does it say they are sisters. People can't read and understand the content. What does this imply about many of AOL readers?

Good Grief 12-23-2007 @ 2:13PM

The article reads that they are "Bush girls", which they are. No where is it written they are sisters or twins. Lighten up you idiots. You were asked to comment on what they are wearing, not become editors for AOL.

ripple 12-23-2007 @ 2:28PM

AOL is really taking a beating on this one, yet never once do they call them the "Bush SISTERS". Perhaps the posters should go back and read the blurb once again. Picture it, now... Two well-known young women, related, both with the same last name walk into a charity gala. The hostess across the room looks over and sees them together. "Oh look! The Bush girls are finally here!" Now look back carefully at the first sentence. I think everyone is so used to clumping the Bush sisters together, you assumed AOL did the same thing. You know what they say about assuming things, people!

michele 12-23-2007 @ 2:30PM

You can tell by the way he worded his little article that he wasn't quite sure of his facts. Not very professional.

gIGGLE 12-23-2007 @ 3:27PM

to me both look like white trailer trash...

Helen 12-25-2007 @ 5:18AM

You must be the TRAILER TRASH. These two women look like ladies, decent and respectable.
You must be some fat slob from the trailer park, making such an ugle remark.
Then again what do a person expect from jealous no good slob.

pepper 12-23-2007 @ 4:30PM

For all of you late comers, the article originally labeled them as sisters. They have since edited their mistake. Mental giants....all of you.....

cleopatra 12-25-2007 @ 12:00AM

Lauren's dress is not tacky; are we forgetting that she's a fashion model. Anyone considering her dress tacky is she herself tacky.

Richard 12-28-2007 @ 11:25AM

http://www.styledash.com/2007/12/17/celebs-at-the-holidays-the-bush-sisters/

does everyone see where it says sisters? the article itself may not say sisters, but the actual website's calling them sisters. I hope you read this celeste, alicia, good grief, and ripple. also, as pepper said, aol edited their article. the person who wrote it did originally call them sisters. so way to go everyone.

| 1 | 2 |