Fabien Baron isn't part of this piece, but Charlie Rose is savvy to explore the super-hyped relaunch. Can these editors bring Interview back by conjuring Warhol? Or is it destined to be just another glossy magazine, filled with famous folks?

For fans, there's hardly an art director in the world with Baron's cache. His affiliation with a print magazine is like David Beckham going to Los Angeles. On the other hand, Interview Magazine hasn't been amazing for a while.

It's true the vintage Interview Magazine had an amazing way of portraying stars, fashion and art that was unlike other publications. Every page, even the ads, had the possibility of opening a new world or style. But even with the all star lineup of talent as editors, the magazine has a serious challenge to reflect newness and relevancy rather than recreate greatest hits.

Photography and image production in the digital world are different arts than Warhol knew as a film and video photographer. Today's photography is much more dependent on composition rather than light for starters. But, more importantly, the production and reproduction of imagery that Warhol pioneered has become so much more accessible.

If anyone can be a star, Interview was about the the brightest. These days, there's so many more stars: The editors are stars, the subjects are stars, the photographers are stars and the designers are stars.