M.I.A's Infant Son Shares Her Fashion Sense
Filed under: CELEBRITY STYLE, Celebrity, News, Hot or Not
M.I.A at the 2009 Grammy Awards. Photo: Getty Images.
Even if you disliked M.I.A's risky fashion getup by House of Holland at the Grammy Awards this February (to jog your memory: it was sheer and black, with polka-dot patches covering her 9-months pregnant belly and breasts) we dare you not to say "Awwwww..." over the miniaturized version that the designer whipped up for her 5-month old son, Ikhyd (pictured above).
As first reported by the Huffington Post, the "Paper Planes" singer showed off the picture of her son with The Exit singer/guitarist Benjamin Bronfman (the oldest son of billionaire CEO Edgar Bronfman Jr.) on her Twitter page Monday, along with the caption "jus fits 5 months old."
Now if only Indian designer Manish Arora could make a tiny pantsuit out of some of the fabric from that other crazy Grammy dress.
Caroline @ Salescoop 7-23-2009 @ 5:25PM
Ha I love this! MIA's outfit was so risky but I think she can definitely pull it off. I think it definitely works on her tot. She is an inspiration to all women who hope to have fashionable looking babies!
Caroline
www.twitter.com/salescoop
Reply
linus922 7-23-2009 @ 11:32PM
That's not fashionable. That's a train wreck!
marsha 7-24-2009 @ 3:08AM
OMG! I wouldn't be caught dead in something like that! Let alone make my baby wearit as well, YUCK!
kkh 7-23-2009 @ 8:12PM
who cares
Reply
murphykoz 7-23-2009 @ 9:50PM
HAHA That'ss right!
karen 7-23-2009 @ 8:19PM
what an a hole
Reply
Krystina 7-23-2009 @ 8:20PM
Caroline @ Salescoop... you are either blind or too darn dumb to realize that her outfit is so darn ugly i wouldnt even line the bottoms of my rabbits trays that they crap and pee in !
and who the hell cares what the hell your baby is wearing cause a.) they grow out of them b.) pee, crap, and puke all over them and C.) dont give a crap about name brands...parents do!
YUCK! no one wants to see a pregnant belly and boobs with stretch marks...besides...pregnant women come a dime a dozen now-a-days since that seems to be the only thing women can do these days...*cough*
PUT SOME DAMN CLOTHES ON!
Reply
Carey 7-24-2009 @ 12:40AM
Spoken like somebody who never had kids and was never pregnant. Well done. Quick tip though, kids usually don't pee or poop on their clothes if you wear diapers on them and potty train them when they're ready. Just in case you ever get pregnant, which I pray to God you never do seeing as you're so understanding of a pregnant woman's body. Fail at life sweetie, fail at life.
luke 7-23-2009 @ 8:25PM
Who let the dogs out?
Reply
camkay123 7-23-2009 @ 8:43PM
Screw fashion that boys eyes couldnt be any more crossed that is what she should worry about instead of that tacky outfit!
Reply
LIZA 7-23-2009 @ 8:44PM
how is She 9 months pregnant and has a 5 month old son.
Reply
julie 7-23-2009 @ 8:54PM
Excellent Question, Liza
REPlying 7-23-2009 @ 8:59PM
she is only pregnant in the picture its an after shot of the baby
jeterlv 7-24-2009 @ 2:31AM
She actually performed in that outfit, the day she was due so in medical terms, she was 10 months pregnant (or 40 weeks full term) He was born a week or less later, so born in February = 5 months old.
And to the "cross eyed" dimwits, he's not cross eyed, you must not have children, their eyes sort of do that when trying to look around in the beginning of life, what ever he's focusing on when he's facing up towards the camera makes it come out looking that way. Typical cute newborn.
jaq 7-24-2009 @ 5:53AM
If u read the article it stated she was 9 months in FEBRUARY, hence a baby born at that time would be, oh, let's say, um, 5 months old in July. By golly, I think that cracks the mystery, folks. Durrrr
V 7-23-2009 @ 8:51PM
Liza the pic of her pregnant was from Feb. She was pregnant with that lil boy.
Reply
julie 7-23-2009 @ 8:53PM
I wish she WERE Missing In Action!
Reply
janet 7-23-2009 @ 8:53PM
Both are FUGLY!
Reply
Lori 7-23-2009 @ 9:05PM
OMG they are NOT "Identical" sheesh, I don't think black and white polka dots are unique you know, it's quite common!
Reply
Heather 7-23-2009 @ 9:13PM
Besides the fact that the outfit is as ugly as ever, it shows very poor taste. Come on ladies, I don't care who you are or what you look like, this is just distasteful! Whoever made this outfit should be banned from creating another piece of clothing FOREVER lmao!
Reply