Threesome or topless?
More than 3/4 of you think the CK campaign 'Threesome' campaign was more risque than Wrangler's topless models. Get the full story here.
Inzemove and Fred & Farid
Do these ads belong in the U.S.?
StyleList readers were nearly evenly divided on this, with 52% thinking that they should run in the States, and 48% finding them inappropriate. Get the full story here.
Inzemove and Fred & Farid
Curly or Straight?
While 30% of you think she's so beautiful that her hair doesn't even matter, 49% of you prefer her curls. Get the full story here.
Kevin Winter, Getty Images | Jon Furniss, WireImage
Offensive or artistic?
Just over 50% of StyleList readers said they weren't offended by this shirt, but didn't know if it was totally appropriate to wear in public. Unfortunately, that wasn't the opinion in Dubai. Get the full story here.
Photo: eBay
ebay
Strapless dresses on 13-year-olds
StyleList readers think strapless dresses should be saved for older girls -- 41% of you think the look is too mature. Get the full story here.
Getty Images
Is Megan the new Angelina?
Half of you think Megan needs to get her own identity and quit copying Angie, but more than a quarter said Jolie doesn't stand a chance against this Fox. Get the full story here.
Getty Images
Did Calvin Klein respond to public's outcry?
The controversial "threesome" billboard in Soho has been replaced with this one, but 51% of you believe it was just to keep people talking about the brand, not because CK caved. Get the full story here.
Rachel Been, AOL
Calvin Klein's Racy Ad
Is it art or practically pornography? About 40% of StyleList readers found this billboard obscene. Get the full story.
Maggie Coughlan, AOL
Palin's Pedi
Do you think Sarah Palin's funky pedicure was appropriate? If so, you're in good company -- 68% of you said it was fun and fabulous. Get the full story.
Getty Images
Bright, Light, or Dark as Night?
How do you like your toenails painted? Over half of StyleList readers prefer their piggies with bright, perky polish. Get the full story.
Getty Images
Briana 6-20-2007 @ 11:46PM
I totally agree with you - this trend is NOT cute. I recently wrote about this at http://www.collegefashion.net/summer-2007/the-high-waisted-debate/ .
Glad someone else feels the same way I do about the high-waisted uglyness. :)
Briana
http://www.collegefashion.net
Reply
NevRsetL4less 6-20-2007 @ 11:56PM
I think she looks cute. She'd look cute in a potato sack anyway, but come on some of us can't wear the lowrider jeans. Not everyone is 21!
Reply
Jerrilynn Woodson 6-21-2007 @ 2:16AM
I don't get what's so sexy about exposed midriff bulge and tacky lower-back tatoos. Hip huggers do nothing to show off a woman's figure. The only practical thing about hip-huggers is that the exposed tatoo warns potential mates of their risk of contracting Hepatitis C. As many as 30% of those with cheap tatoos are carriers and they don't even know it. Wow, what a fashion statement! Might as well walk around with a needle sticking out of your arm and a sign saying "I may also carry HIV." How attractive. J. Woodson, R.N.
Reply
BigCupOSTFU 6-21-2007 @ 2:54AM
Well, at least we know even Fergie shops Goodwill, cause those are my grandpa's jeans that I donated.
PS. #3, a little deep for a fashion article, no?
Reply
Stefanie 6-23-2007 @ 7:35AM
WOooo to Jerrilynn Woodson... GET REAL. I have a tatto on my lower back in rememberance of a VERY good friend. Just because someone has a lower back tatto does NOT mean they have Hep C or HIV. GRow UP. You might have it since your so busy brandishing other women as having it.....
As for the high waist jeans. Those things look horrendous and make me think a flood is in the making.. And lordy they look so UNcomfortable!
Fergie hate to do this... STYLE FOUL!
Reply
Catey 6-23-2007 @ 8:47AM
Low rise ,"hip-huggers", do not look good on everyone, especially females with full hips but no butt.This is unfortunately one of those fashion trends that girls feel obligated to wear because of trend sake, regardless of how they really look on them.
Reply
Kerry 6-23-2007 @ 6:06PM
Way to go cameltoe!
Reply
Susan 6-24-2007 @ 12:52PM
#3 You are right!! I am an RN, too, and even in my super upscale area we are seeing hundreds of girls with Hepatitis C & tattoos. You are sadly right, too, that if the tattoo operator's practices let Hepatitis C pass along, HIV is entirely possible, too. And using disposable needles is NOT the only answer.
Reply
Jacqueline 6-24-2007 @ 2:01PM
Jerrilynn, just so you know, not everyone with a " tacky lower back tattoo" has a disease. Either do your research, take a poll, or shut the hell up before you start talking about what other people have or do to their bodies.
Reply
Anne 6-24-2007 @ 8:10PM
No love handles, gut's not hanging out, no crack showing... What's the problem? Not all of us can wear low-riders. I think she looks great!
Reply
Jenni 6-24-2007 @ 8:17PM
BTW - not everyone who wears low riders has a lower back tattoo or plumber's crack. I HATE highwaisted pants. For those of us with tiny waists and rounder bottoms, the lower rise pants are the only ones that are comfortable to sit in. Any pants I wear with more than a 7 inch rise pulls into my belly and sticks out in the back when I sit down - which ends up flashing the world my undies and giving me a terrible tummy ache.
Those look awful on everyone, and I'm glad it's not likely to catch on.
Reply
Patty 6-24-2007 @ 8:22PM
Thank you Fergie! Ridiculous low-rise needs to go and the sooner the better. I can count on one hand the number of women who have the body to wear low-rise or hip-hugger jeans. Bring on jean that fit and flatter.
Reply
jdwilly 6-24-2007 @ 8:28PM
I don,t like hip huggers on women it makes them look cheap, also it looks like they just took a CRAP and forgot to pull there pants up all the way
Reply
Taylor 6-24-2007 @ 8:29PM
I actually like the high-waisted trend. Very 70's, cool retro :]
Reply
Jane 6-24-2007 @ 8:31PM
At least she looks like a lady. No matter what some women wear these days, there's always that know-it-all ready to pounce on them. I have never seen anyone who looked good, or decent, in low-rider oants. They all lokk trampy and low-class to me. Covering your body up can be sexier than showing it all. What's left to imagine ?
Reply
AJ 6-24-2007 @ 8:32PM
When I was growing up in the 60s and 70s, that was called a normal outfit. Please, get over yourselves.
Reply
Mr B 6-24-2007 @ 8:35PM
The high waisted look is so much better than the "tons" of girls wearing hip huggers with flabs of fat falling over the waist line. Styles change constantly, it's just something that will take time to get used to.
Reply
Amanda Foster 6-24-2007 @ 8:36PM
For god's sake...
Okay, screw what other people are wearing, okay? You're complaining that everyone should wear low rise or high rise because this-and-this stereotype.
If one type works better on your body, fine. Don't come attacking every person who wears the type that doesn't work for you.
Bottom line, WE DON'T CARE.
Reply
ceres 6-24-2007 @ 8:37PM
I'm not a big Fergie fan, but i'd have to say she looks chic and elegant in this picture. I'm a high school teacher, and i can say that few high school girls can carry off the bare midriff look, much less anyone over 21.
Reply
shantaem 6-24-2007 @ 8:41PM
I agree completely my 60 year old mother does'nt wear her pants that high. Pants that high and tight your just asking for YEAST issues. FYI pullum down and loosen up a bit.
Reply