Curly or Straight?
While 30% of you think she's so beautiful that her hair doesn't even matter, 49% of you prefer her curls. Get the full story here.
Kevin Winter, Getty Images | Jon Furniss, WireImage
Offensive or artistic?
Just over 50% of StyleList readers said they weren't offended by this shirt, but didn't know if it was totally appropriate to wear in public. Unfortunately, that wasn't the opinion in Dubai. Get the full story here.
Photo: eBay
ebay
Strapless dresses on 13-year-olds
StyleList readers think strapless dresses should be saved for older girls -- 41% of you think the look is too mature. Get the full story here.
Getty Images
Is Megan the new Angelina?
Half of you think Megan needs to get her own identity and quit copying Angie, but more than a quarter said Jolie doesn't stand a chance against this Fox. Get the full story here.
Getty Images
Did Calvin Klein respond to public's outcry?
The controversial "threesome" billboard in Soho has been replaced with this one, but 51% of you believe it was just to keep people talking about the brand, not because CK caved. Get the full story here.
Rachel Been, AOL
Calvin Klein's Racy Ad
Is it art or practically pornography? About 40% of StyleList readers found this billboard obscene. Get the full story.
Maggie Coughlan, AOL
Palin's Pedi
Do you think Sarah Palin's funky pedicure was appropriate? If so, you're in good company -- 68% of you said it was fun and fabulous. Get the full story.
Getty Images
Bright, Light, or Dark as Night?
How do you like your toenails painted? Over half of StyleList readers prefer their piggies with bright, perky polish. Get the full story.
Getty Images
Nipple cream as lip balm?
StyleList readers are willing to try anything! 80% of you either love the idea or, at the very least, think it's worth a try. Get the full story.
notsogoodphotography on flickr
Skip the skinny jeans
Skinny jeans might be bad for you, but more than 50 percent of you never wore them anyway! Get the full story.
Getty Images
shopgirll 9-29-2007 @ 11:07PM
Thing is, Kelly probably did not pay for that bag. It was probably a "gift". LV will probably get plenty of sales from wannabes that see her carrying it around!
Reply
nadia 10-03-2007 @ 6:21AM
You know, back home, where i come from, we use them as grocery shopping bags and they cost about $1-$3.
Reply
nadia 10-03-2007 @ 6:21AM
You know, back home, where i come from, we use them as grocery shopping bags and they cost about $1-$3.
Reply
Sarah 10-03-2007 @ 6:32AM
Every time I see Kelly Osborne, I wonder if she regrets getting those hideous tatoos.
Reply
gotta love it 10-03-2007 @ 6:37AM
To each his/her own!!
That's what makes it all very interesting.
Reply
Valerie 10-03-2007 @ 6:43AM
The bag lady down the street has the same bag sanz the Vouitton thing, she keeps hers full of empty cans.
Reply
Michelle 10-03-2007 @ 6:57AM
I've personally never liked LV bags and have never fathomed why some women love them. On the other hand I think this new one isn't half bad, I wouldn't pay more than $5 for it but it's the first LV I've seen that I didn't have the gut reaction of "ugh" to.
Reply
CJ 10-03-2007 @ 7:01AM
Mine cost ninety-nine cents. No LV of course.
Reply
R 10-03-2007 @ 7:23AM
Louis Vuitton is not the leader in overpriced handbags, that's just silly. They never go out of style and they wear well, so you wind up keeping them much longer than a regular bag and therefore get to amortize the cost over the life of the bag.
Reply
laprns 10-03-2007 @ 7:24AM
That one is nowhere near as bad as that pieced together craptastic bag Bouncy has been carrying. It's some limited edition, 50K joke Marc Jacobs or some designer there with a sense of humor put together.
Reply
christi 10-03-2007 @ 7:36AM
you can get this same bag in Mexico for 2 bucks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply
Q 10-03-2007 @ 7:41AM
We do carry those as market bags in Belgium and they cost about 2 euro a pop, without the signature LV.
Reply
cchristinefor 10-03-2007 @ 7:47AM
the poster in regard to her getting the bag free is most definitely correct...the poster who said that she is certainly ruining herself, by getting all those dark tatoos is certainly correct...she is starting to look like her dad (who i love after watching the osbournes)...as they say, apples don't fall far from trees...oh...i really love the bag and the price makes it even more desirable...as everything is relative, it depends on your finances, but again, those who can most afford it, get it for free LOL!
Reply
John F.C. Taylor 10-03-2007 @ 7:48AM
Even if it were a gift, that thing shouldn't be seen in public. Even if it weren't ugly, prices like the one quoted in the article are just rediculous. Take $2,400 to K-Mart or Wal-Mart and you could buy a whole wardroobe, not just one ugly bag.
Reply
all4blairs 10-03-2007 @ 7:53AM
they? What?
Reply
Rossi 10-03-2007 @ 7:58AM
Oh good grief...it isn't a regular handbag...it's a daytripper. You know...or overnighter. ANNNNNND for that purpose...I like it
Reply
sirenrose 10-03-2007 @ 8:02AM
it's a hideous bag, I saw a little old lady carrying it in the supermarket.
2400! You got to be kidding me, she has no taste whatsoever.
Yuk!!!
Reply
Hotmale 10-03-2007 @ 8:16AM
If you got it flant it, but don't flant it with that ugly a_ _ bag. There is nothing that any of Ozzies kids need to flant except his oldest daughter, ( the one with sense and good looking one) that can flant anything. So please keep these other two pitiful kids out of the headlines.
Reply
drock 10-03-2007 @ 8:23AM
she has an eating problem. kelly, keep you chubby fingers out of the cookie jar!
Reply
vampiretombartek 10-03-2007 @ 8:30AM
Those are tattoos???? Why do people do that to themselves?
As for the bag: plaid????? Why does LV put out such ugly stuff? Well, at least it is better looking than the bag that is the color of baby poop.
-author of the book The Vampire Tom Bartek
Reply