Maggie Gyllenhaal posed in her undies 'as an art project'
Filed under: Swimwear and Lingerie, Celebrities with Style
Last summer we brought you the news that Maggie Gyllenhaal was posing in sexy skivvies for lingerie maker Agent Provocateur. At the time the world wasn't quite sure they were ready for the quirky actress to tempt us in seductive underoos, and it sounds like Maggie wasn't too sure about it either.She told the UK's Metro newspaper that:
"I couldn't believe how it made me look. The whole thing was a pleasure to do. When they came out, though, I was a bit surprised. Somehow I hadn't understood that there'd be all these pictures of me out there in my underwear. I did it as an art project."
Erm. OK. Seems to me if you'd ever heard of Agent Provocateur, seen one of their TV ads (don't watch that at the office, by the way), or picked up one of their catalogs you'd be pretty clear that modeling for them meant posing in next to nothing. Maggie, on the other hand, is apparently not a master of the obvious.
[via Catwalk Queen]
don 1-08-2008 @ 2:23PM
As far as I am concerned, Maggie is hot..very earthy and sultry look. She looks great in the lingerie shots and by today's standards they could almost be G-rated. There is worse than that in the Sears Catalog, if it were still around.
Reply
Lisa 1-08-2008 @ 3:06PM
She's gorgeous and looks great in this ad. Keep doing "art projects" Maggie.
Reply
PANTYsniffer 1-08-2008 @ 3:07PM
she's easy on the eyes, tastefully done
Reply
Bill 1-08-2008 @ 3:48PM
Hot or not? You kidding me with a question like that? I had to bring the fire extinguisher out to take care of my computer!
Reply
RANCH 1-08-2008 @ 4:00PM
Maggie is "HOTTER THAN A FOX IN A FOREST FIRE"!!! She should be proud. If I were a gal , I'd Do a Lingerie Shot ANYTIME!
Reply
allie 1-08-2008 @ 6:09PM
She looks much better in these pictures than she does in real life. She should be happy. It should also prove to men that the girls in Playboy do not need to be attractive if there is an airbrush around!
Reply
m washing 1-10-2008 @ 6:05PM
allie~
I totally agree with you. She is sort of strange looking.
Chiane 1-08-2008 @ 6:10PM
I think she looks fantastic, good for her!!
Reply
DukeSteele 1-08-2008 @ 6:28PM
If she actually had a killer body, I'd at least say she was a butterface. Her face looks like it melting. Please don't do that again.
Reply
Gina Boltz 1-08-2008 @ 6:31PM
Maggie is a wonderful actress and, as far as I know, a fine person, but she always seemed homely and unshapely to me. This others side of her just shows I need glasses.
These are stunning photos; truly art and something to be proud of.
Reply
Jebby 1-08-2008 @ 7:27PM
Good Lord, are you people kidding me? This chick looks like a 50 year old pig. She has absolutely zero sex appeal.
I see airbrushing has done her wonders but it still can't hide all the ugly.
Reply
Glenn 1-08-2008 @ 7:45PM
To those nieve individuals who think that models are tweny years old and no imperfections, I say rubbish. Bring on the Maggie's of the world who truely resemble what mainstream looks like. Maybe it is time for the mature models to shine. Great work. Cudos to Maggie Let is shine, show the world who you are
Reply
URKiddinMee 1-08-2008 @ 7:54PM
I got your "Art Project!"
Reply
Merrily 1-08-2008 @ 8:35PM
Maggie looks great. You Go Girl. You are beautiful!
Reply
Ellen Benigno 1-13-2008 @ 2:32PM
Maggie sure isn't the one who got the looks in THIS family!!
Reply