Jennifer Aniston's GQ Tie - Win It (Maybe)
Filed under: Celebrities with Style, Contests & Giveaways
Jennifer Aniston's nudie GQ cover has been out for a while now, but it hasn't stopped making waves. That tie she's "wearing" is sure to become a question in the next Trivial Pursuit Pop Culture Edition. And, it could possibly become yours. Maybe.Amazon is running a contest to give away the actual tie from the photo shoot -- you can enter here. Although, we're a little confused, seeing as how Aniston gave that same tie to David Letterman when she appeared on his show.
So, what is it? Did Jen give Dave a fake? Did Dave regift the tie to a pal at Amazon? What's going on here?
Whatever. All we know is that it would be pretty cool to win it, and you have until January 19th to enter.
Jennifer Aniston: Stunning or Sad?
At 39-years-old, America's favorite romantically-challenged TV icon has still got it. Jennifer Aniston appears on the cover of this month's GQ in barely more than her birthday suit -- but, while she obviously looks gorgeous, we have to wonder: Does this seem a little desperate to anyone else?
Because if you'll remember, Jen's been "revealing" that she's still a little bitter about her Brangelina-induced break-up -- particularly the part where Angie and Brad fell for one another while he and Jen were still married.
Not like that it wasn't totally obvious to the rest of us, but when your ex-husband's new super-hot girlfriend publicly proclaims that he wasn't faithful to you, that's gotta sting.
Of course it wasn't always this way. In the 90's Jennifer Aniston was the center of the universe -- with every man in Hollywood (and beyond) dying for a date with the adorable girl next door.
So when she hooked up with Brad Pitt -- arguably the most desirable man on the planet -- it was a romance that we'd once thought was only possible in fairy tales and impossible romantic comedies.
But by January 2005, that fairy tale crumbled to pieces. Brad and Jen had been sordidly usurped by Brad and Angie, who'd met on the set of their sexy thriller, Mr. and Mrs. Smith. By November of that year Jen was on the comeback trail, showing the world she was over the break-up by showing some skin as GQ's first "Woman of the Year."
And for a moment, things looked good. Maybe Vince Vaughn wasn't just a rebound guy after all. Sure they seemed totally wrong for one another, but if they were getting married then clearly it'd all worked out for the best. Hooray! The dumped girl has been cured!
Oh wait. Maybe not. It seems Jen wasn't ready to accept that she'd fallen from "World's Most Desirable Heartthrob" to "That Chubby Guy You Met in Line for Pretzels at the Knicks Game." And of course rumors start to circulate that she's romantically illiterate and will never find love.
And just for fun, in December 2006, almost two years after Brad and Jen had bombed, our heroine, unlucky in love, gets to relive her failed marriage while suffering through a failed engagement. Awesome!
And that led to a few pretty lonely months. Jen dated some random guy no one had ever heard of -- and it still didn't work out -- but by that point the world had grown weary of the eminent disaster that was every Jennifer Aniston relationship.
OK, time to triumph over tragedy! In November 2007 we met the new Jennifer Aniston -- ready to break free from botched marriages, engagements, friendships, and whatever -- set to devour life as a confident, secure, totally not needy (so there's no reason to be scared of marrying me!) woman in the prime of her life.
Andy 1-14-2009 @ 9:23PM
A customer came to the store and asked where he could buy the same tie Jennifer Aniston wore for the cover of GQ magazine. Jennifer gave the tie to Letterman. I cannot believe when I saw Letterman put on the tie on TV with the half-Windsor knot. I gave the customer a lecture on how to arch out a tie according to Dr. Ivan Chen's book. It is sad to see a reputed fashion magazine to use a naked body to promote a tie. Mark Twain once said, "Clothes make the man. Naked people have little or no influence on society."
Reply